Resumen : In much of the developing world, sharp curettage (SC) is the most commonly used technique for treating incomplete abortion. The procedure is usually performed in a hospital setting where physicians and operating theatres are available; it often involves light to heavy sedation for pain control and an overnight hospital stay for patient recuperation and monitoring. This study examined the hypothesis that use of manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) ; a variation of vacuum aspiration (VA) ; would be less costly than SC and thus be advantageous to healthcare systems with limited resources. The purpose of the study was to identify and, where possible, to explain the factors that contributed to cost differences between MVA and SC for treatment of incomplete abortion. To achieve this objective, researchers observed patient management and documented resource use at hospital sites in Kenya and Mexico. The results of the study support the researchers' hypothesis that, in most cases, treatment with MVA required a shorter patient stay and fewer hospital resources than SC, as the two techniques were practiced at the various study sites. The policy decision to adopt MVA, supported by procurement of instruments and incorporation of training in its use, is the basic prerequisite to achieving reduced levels of resource use. The study results also suggest that the full advantages of MVA can be realized only if it is introduced in conjunction with certain changes in patient management, such as offering outpatient treatment for incomplete abortion.
Web site : http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02779536