Abstract : Despite the existence of less costly and less invasive techniques to evaluate abnormal uterine bleeding, sharp curettage continues to be the most common form of endometrial sampling in the less developed world. Because manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) equipment is often associated with abortion care in countries where abortion is illegal, many practitioners have been slow to incorporate its use for other gynecological conditions. In this study, MVA was introduced in a large teaching hospital in El Salvador as an alternative for patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. Hospital cost, length of stay and complication rates were compared in a prospective, nonrandomized controlled study of 163 patients assigned to either traditional sharp curettage or MVA services. Patients were assigned to each group depending on the availability of trained providers. Methodologies for cost-savings analysis were modified to obtain more precise cost estimates. Use of MVA was associated with a significant cost savings of 11% and a hospital stay that was 27% shorter as compared to sharp curettage. Cost savings could be much higher if MVA was institutionalized as an ambulatory procedure with minimal or no preoperative evaluation and postoperative stay. (author's)
Web site : http://www1.elsevier.com/cdweb/journals/00107824/viewer.htt?iss=5 vol=68 viewtype=issue